environmentalresearchweb blog
« Climate Change Congress: Stern words | Main | EGU Assembly: coming soon! »
Climate Change Congress: Scientists and prime minister go head to head
Stefan Rahmstorf of Germany’s Potsdam Institute stressed
how he sees the 2 degree target for climate change as an absolute upper limit,
not just a guideline. “When politicians talk about an ambition of 2
degrees, if all goes reasonably well we get 3,” he said. “As
scientists that really is an upper limit we should not cross. At 2 degrees I
think we have more than a 1 in 6 chance of really bad impacts.” This
morning delegates heard John Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute,
explain how that more than 1 in 6 chance is worse than your odds of survival
when playing Russian Roulette.
Rasmussen, however, was somewhat dismayed by this news.
“I need some concrete advice now,” he said. “We had a very hard
battle in the EU to get the 2 degree target, and now you tell me it’s not
enough. I need to know and I need to know today.”
Will Steffen of Australian National University stepped in
to the debate to explain that coming up with a number is a risk game. He
believes it’s up to politicians to decide how much of a risk society is
prepared to take. And while Steffen thinks 2 degrees is a reasonable target for
2009, the situation could change in five years. Rahmstorf insisted he would
advise a more ambitious target if at all possible, one that leaves room for
manoeuvre and a safety margin.
In response, Rasmussen recommended that scientists not
give politicians too many moving targets. “It is already complex,” he
said. “I need your help to move this in the right direction.” The
process now is for discussion of the agreement at the G8 summit in July, the UN
meeting in September and the December meeting back in Copenhagen. Rasmussen
says there will be three key elements to the agreement - targets, funding and
verification.
With regards to targets, the aim is to cut global
emissions by 50% compared to 1990 levels by 2050. “I have noted that that
should be a minimum,” said Rasmussen. A binding agreement should come from
developed countries to cut their emissions substantially by 2020, and by 80% by
2050. Developing countries, meanwhile, should cut their emissions by 15-30% compared
to business-as-usual by 2020, and after that create real reductions.
Developed countries should provide funds to developing
countries to help them transform to a low carbon economy, with forests and land
use as part of the package, continued the prime minister. They should also help
with adaptation and the dissemination of technology. And a reliable and
transparent system is needed to verify international actions, both on emissions
and technology.
“I call on the scientific community to follow the trends
closely and help us adjust our course,” said Rasmussen.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.iop.org/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/2838
